DCSIMG

LETTER: Strongly opposed to Handley Chase development

Having viewed the revised proposals for an astonishing 1,400 dwellings which Sleaford does not need, I would like to register my vehement opposition to them.

The planned development lies outside the curtilage of the town on a long standing greenfield site.

To my knowledge this is the third or fourth proposal of one form or another for this site and it’s abundantly clear that the owner(s) of this land is determined to push through this unnecessary development.

This proposal represents almost 30 per cent of the 4,000 homes NKDC have identified a need for over the next 25 years, in one town on one site, it would also represent 20 per cent of the total population of Sleaford.

As most homes have two vehicles it would also generate an extra 2,800 cars in the south of the town.

If there is such a need for vast housing schemes, turning Sleaford from a market town into an urban sprawl and all existing brownfield sites have been developed, then and only then we may have to look at greenfield sites. Any such greenfield site must be suitable though, with suitable roads and access, quite clearly this site does not have any of these.

The proposed development would cause catastrophic traffic congestion to the south of the town in particular Silk Willoughby, Quarrington, Ickworth Road, Victoria Avenue, St Edmund’s Road and Ancaster Drive, which would all serve as shortcuts onto London and Grantham Roads.

On an average day it already takes between 15-20 minutes to travel by car from one side of town to the other, with the town centre at a standstill through Southgate and along Carre Street, with queuing traffic onto Grantham Road, Boston Road and Northgate.

A further 1,400 dwellings and their associated cars, will only add to this misery, driving people away from the town centre, to shop as they already do, in Lincoln and more accessible places, with thriving town centres.

The town centre is and has been for a number of years in decline, even with the large numbers of houses developed over the past 20 years. So for the developers to claim additional dwellings and people would bring investment into the town is pure folly.

Sleaford is a rural market town and does not have the infrastructure in place to support housing to this extent, let alone on the south of the town with its existing roads. Sleaford is already lacking in all-important jobs, both full-time and part-time, with most people commuting to work outside of the town, let alone shops, schools, doctors, dentists and leisure facilities. No matter how the developers dress this up in the guise of “investing in” Sleaford, we all recognise that at the heart of this proposal it’s all about making money.

There are brownfield sites within the town curtilage that should and could be developed before any considerations are given to greenfield sites outside the town curtilage. A regeneration of brownfield sites would be beneficial on so many levels and may even lead to rejuvenating the town centre, with its numerous empty shops, pubs and flats, instead of creating mini ‘villages’ on the outskirts of the town and keeping people out of the town centre.

If the developers are so concerned about Sleaford, as they say they are, then surely they should invest their money into existing brownfield sites, such as The Maltings, St Botolph’s old school, Bonner House, etc, and the town centre itself. No doubt, if this proposal went ahead it would be promptly followed by the adjoining land being developed and eventually the joining up of Sleaford, Silk Willoughby and Quarrington. Of course any future developments are conveniently omitted from the current drawings on display, even though it is plain to see that at least double the land would suddenly become free for further developments. Perhaps over 2,800 dwellings, 7,000 people?

I fail to see how the council’s reason for refusal for planning on June 1, 2009 has changed and I will oppose this development at every given opportunity.

Simon Titley

Sleaford


 
Find It

"Business owner? - Claim your business and Advertise with us"

In association with qype logo

Looking for...

Featured advertisers

Jobs

Search for a job

Motors

Search for a car

Property

Search for a house

Weather for Sleaford

Wednesday 22 May 2013

5 day forecast

Today

Cloudy

Cloudy

Temperature: 4 C to 15 C

Wind Speed: 21 mph

Wind direction: North west

Tomorrow

Light showers

Light showers

Temperature: 6 C to 10 C

Wind Speed: 23 mph

Wind direction: North west

Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.

Sleaford Standard provides news, events and sport features from the Sleaford area. For the best up to date information relating to Sleaford and the surrounding areas visit us at Sleaford Standard regularly or bookmark this page.